The University of the State of New York
The State Education Department
OVERVIEW OF STATEWIDE PERFORMANCE IN
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE
AND
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE
for
Public Schools
March 2003
THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Regents
of The University
Robert M. Bennett, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. ....................................................................... Tonawanda
Adelaide L. Sanford, Vice Chancellor, B.A.,
M.A., P.D. ............................................... Hollis
Diane O’Neill McGivern, B.S.N., M.A., Ph.D. .............................................................. Staten Island
Saul B. Cohen, B.A., M.A., Ph.D............................................................................................ New Rochelle
James C. Dawson, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. .......................................................................... Peru
Robert M. Johnson, B.S., J.D. ............................................................................................... Huntington
Anthony S. Bottar, B.A., J.D. ............................................................................................. North Syracuse
Merryl H. Tisch, B.A., M.A. ................................................................................................... New York
Geraldine D. Chapey, B.A., M.A., Ed.D........................................................................... Belle Harbor
Arnold B. Gardner, B.A., LL.B........................................................................................... Buffalo
Harry Phillips,
3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ...................................................................................... Hartsdale
Joseph E. Bowman, Jr., B.A., M.L.S., M.A.,
M.Ed., Ed.D................................................ Albany
Lorraine A. CortÉs-VÁzquez, B.A., M.P.A.................................................................. Bronx
Judith O. Rubin, A.B. ................................................................................................................ New York
James R. Tallon, jr., B.A., M.A. .......................................................................................... Binghamton
Milton L. Cofield, B.S., M.B.A.,
Ph.D. ............................................................................... Rochester
President of The University and Commissioner of
Education
Richard P. Mills
Chief Operating Officer
Richard H. Cate
Deputy Commissioner for Elementary, Middle,
Secondary and Continuing Education
James A. Kadamus
Coordinator, School Operations and Management
Services
Charles Szuberla
Coordinator, Information and Reporting Services
Martha P. Musser
The State Education Department does not discriminate on
the basis of age, color, religion, creed, disability, marital status, veteran
status, national origin, race, gender, genetic predisposition or carrier
status, or sexual orientation in its educational programs, services and
activities. Portions of this
publication can be made available in a variety of formats, including braille,
large print or audio tape, upon request.
Inquiries concerning this policy of nondiscrimination should be directed
to the Department’s Office for Diversity, Ethics, and Access, Room 530,
Education Building, Albany, NY 12234. Requests
for additional copies of this publication may be made by contacting the
Publications Sales Desk, Room 309, Education Building, Albany, NY 12234.
Please
address all correspondence about this report that is not related to data corrections
to:
School Report Card Coordinator
Information and Reporting
Services Team
New York State Education
Department
Room 863 EBA
89 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12234
E-mail: RPTCARD@mail.nysed.gov
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on student performance and other measures of performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on the State’s strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
The New York State Report Card consists of three parts: the Overview of Performance in English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science and Analysis of Student Subgroup Performance, the Comprehensive Information Report, and the Accountability Report. The Overview and Analysis presents performance data on measures required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act: English, mathematics, science, and graduation rate. Performance data on other State assessments can be found in the Comprehensive Information Report. The Accountability Report provides information as to whether a district/school is making adequate progress toward enabling all students to achieve proficiency in English and mathematics.
State assessments are designed to help ensure that all students reach high learning standards. They show whether students are getting the foundation knowledge they need to succeed at the elementary, middle, and commencement levels and beyond. The State requires that students who are not making appropriate progress toward the standards receive academic intervention services.
In the Overview, performance on the elementary- and middle-level assessments in English language arts and mathematics and on the middle-level science test is reported in terms of mean scores and the percentage of students scoring at each of the four levels. These levels indicate performance on the standards from seriously deficient to advanced proficiency. Performance on the elementary-level science test is reported in terms of mean scores and the percentage of students making appropriate progress. Regents examination scores are reported in four score ranges. Scores of 65 to 100 are passing; scores of 55 to 64 earn credit toward a local diploma (with the approval of the local board of education). Though each elementary- and middle-level assessment is administered to students in a specific grade, secondary-level assessments are taken by students when they complete the coursework for the core curriculum. Therefore, the performance of students at the secondary level is measured for a student cohort rather than a group of students at a particular grade level. Students are grouped in cohorts according to the year in which they first entered grade 9.
The assessment data in the Overview and Analysis are for all tested students in the State, including general-education students and students with disabilities. In the Analysis, performance is disaggregated by race/ethnicity, disability status, gender, LEP status, income level, and migrant status.
Explanations of terms referred to or symbols used in this part of the report card may be found in the glossary on the last page. Further information on the report card may be found in the guide, Understanding Your School Report Card 2003, available at your district or on the Information and Reporting Services Web site at www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts.
Overview of Statewide Performance
in
English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science
State Profile
|
Organization 2001–02 |
School Statewide Staff (both full-
and part-time) |
||
|
Grade Range |
Student Enrollment |
Count of Teachers |
Count of Other Professionals |
|
K-12 |
2,828,318 |
217,739 |
40,823 |
|
2000–01
NYS Public Schools Total Expenditure per Pupil |
$11,871 |
|
Student
Demographics |
1999–2000 |
2000–2001 |
2001–2002 |
|||
|
Count* |
Percent |
Count* |
Percent |
Count* |
Percent |
|
|
Limited English
Proficient |
230,625 |
8.1% |
201,319 |
7.0% |
193,605 |
6.8% |
|
Eligible for Free
Lunch |
1,064,388 |
38.2% |
1,061,386 |
38.1% |
1,054,668 |
37.7% |
*Counts of limited English proficient students and students
eligible for free lunch in 1999–2000 do not
include charter schools. Counts in 2000–2001 and 2001–2002 include charter
schools.
2001–02
Percentage of Core Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers*
|
Number of
Core Classes |
Percent
Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers |
|
441,140 |
87% |
*For the 2001–02 school year only, teachers of core classes
are considered to be highly qualified if they are certified to teach that
subject.
2001–02
Percentage of Teachers with No Valid Teaching Certificate*
|
Number of
Teachers |
Percent No
Valid Teaching Certificate |
|
212,441 |
8% |
*This
count includes teachers with temporary licenses who do not have a valid
permanent or provisional teaching certificate.
Elementary Level
English Language Arts
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Performance
(All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
NY State
Public
|
||||||
|
Performance Statewide |
Counts of
Students Tested
|
Mean Score |
||||
|
Level 1 455–602 |
Level 2 603–644 |
Level 3 645–691 |
Level 4 692–800 |
Total |
||
|
Jan–Feb 2000 |
20,895 |
68,230 |
93,796 |
33,865 |
216,786 |
653 |
|
Jan–Feb 2001 |
22,361 |
63,550 |
92,584 |
36,542 |
215,037 |
653 |
Jan–Feb 2002 |
17,347 |
64,714 |
87,030 |
43,729 |
212,820 |
659 |
Elementary-Level English Language Arts Levels — Listening, Reading, and Writing Standards |
|
|
Level 4 |
These students exceed the standards and are moving toward high performance on the Regents examination. |
|
Level 3 |
These students meet the standards and, with continued steady growth, should pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 2 |
These students need extra help to meet the standards and pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 1 |
These students have serious academic deficiencies. |
Performance of Limited English Proficient
(LEP) Students
|
Grade 4 |
English Proficiency Below Effective Participation Level |
Making Appropriate Progress |
|
2002 |
6,261 |
4,981 |
Performance of Elementary-Level Students
with Severe Disabilities on the New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) in
English
|
|
Number
Tested |
AA–Level 1 |
AA–Level 2 |
AA–Level 3 |
AA–Level 4 |
|
2001–02 |
2,076 |
154 |
769 |
1,131 |
22 |
Elementary Level
Mathematics
Grade 4 Mathematics Performance
(All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
NY State
Public
|
||||||
|
Performance Statewide |
Counts of
Students Tested
|
Mean Score |
||||
|
Level 1 448–601 |
Level 2 602–636 |
Level 3 637–677 |
Level 4 678–810 |
Total |
||
|
May 2000 |
19,869 |
57,034 |
102,263 |
41,503 |
220,669 |
648 |
|
May 2001 |
18,709 |
49,163 |
93,740 |
58,242 |
219,854 |
655 |
May 2002 |
15,737 |
54,686 |
96,999 |
49,099 |
216,521 |
651 |
Elementary-Level Mathematics Levels —Knowledge, Reasoning, and Problem-Solving Standards |
|
|
Level 4 |
These students exceed the standards and are moving toward high performance on the Regents examination. |
|
Level 3 |
These students meet the standards and, with continued steady growth, should pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 2 |
These students need extra help to meet the standards and pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 1 |
These students have serious academic deficiencies. |
Performance of Elementary-Level Students
with Severe Disabilities on the New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) in
Mathematics, Science, and Technology
|
|
Number
Tested |
AA–Level 1 |
AA–Level 2 |
AA–Level 3 |
AA–Level 4 |
|
2001–02 |
2,408 |
188 |
992 |
1,210 |
18 |
Elementary Level
Science Multiple-Choice
Grade 4 Science Performance
(All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
|
|
|
Number Tested |
Number Above SDL
|
Mean Score |
|
May 2000 |
220,400 |
144,983 |
32 |
|
May 2001 |
218,522 |
145,777 |
32 |
|
May 2002 |
214,650 |
148,365 |
33 |
|
Grade
4 Science — Knowledge, Reasoning, and Problem-Solving Standards |
|
|
Multiple-Choice Test Component |
This component
contains 45 multiple-choice questions based upon the New York State Elementary Science Syllabus and
referenced to the New York State Learning
Standards for Mathematics, Science and Technology (Elementary Level). |
|
State Designated Level (SDL) |
Students who
correctly answer fewer than 30 of the 45 questions of the multiple-choice
test component must receive academic intervention services in the following
term of instruction. |
|
School Mean Scores |
For
the multiple-choice test component, the mean score is the average number of
correct answers for students tested. If all tested students answered all
questions correctly, this score would be 45. |
Elementary Level
Science Performance Test
The elementary-level science test is composed of two sections, the multiple-choice section (described above) and the performance test. The performance test is not used to determine the need for academic intervention services or for accountability purposes because not all students are administered the same three tasks.
|
|
Number Tested |
Mean Score |
|
May 2000 |
214,973 |
32 |
|
May 2001 |
215,144 |
33 |
|
May 2002 |
209,839 |
33 |
Middle Level
English Language Arts
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Performance
(All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
NY State
Public
|
|
Performance Statewide |
Counts of
Students Tested
|
Mean Score |
||||
|
Level 1 527–661 |
Level 2 662–700 |
Level 3 701–738 |
Level 4 739–830 |
Total |
||
|
May 2000 |
25,857 |
82,038 |
69,063 |
19,038 |
195,996 |
697 |
|
May 2001 |
26,696 |
81,445 |
66,879 |
21,453 |
196,473 |
698 |
|
|
Level 1 527–659 |
Level 2 660–698 |
Level 3 699–737 |
Level 4 738–830 |
Total |
|
March 2002 |
14,738 |
100,200 |
70,432 |
21,048 |
206,418 |
697 |
Middle-Level English Language Arts Levels — Listening, Reading, and Writing Standards |
|
|
Level 4 |
These students exceed the standards and are moving toward high performance on the Regents examination. |
|
Level 3 |
These students meet the standards and, with continued steady growth, should pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 2 |
These students need extra help to meet the standards and pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 1 |
These students have serious academic deficiencies. |
Performance of Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students
|
Grade 8 |
English Proficiency Below Effective Participation Level |
Making Appropriate Progress |
|
2002 |
6,062 |
4,727 |
Performance of Middle-Level Students with Severe Disabilities on the New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) in English
|
|
Number
Tested |
AA–Level 1 |
AA–Level 2 |
AA–Level 3 |
AA–Level 4 |
|
2001–02 |
2,028 |
97 |
751 |
1,163 |
17 |
Middle Level
Mathematics
Grade 8 Mathematics Performance
(All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
NY State
Public
|
|
Performance Statewide |
Counts of
Students Tested
|
Mean Score |
||||
|
Level 1 517–680 |
Level 2 681–715 |
Level 3 716–759 |
Level 4 760–882 |
Total |
||
|
May 2000 |
49,334 |
68,700 |
66,290 |
13,770 |
198,094 |
705 |
|
May 2001 |
52,663 |
68,403 |
62,884 |
16,034 |
199,984 |
703 |
May 2002 |
40,707 |
68,169 |
77,210 |
22,097 |
208,183 |
712 |
Middle-Level Mathematics Levels — Knowledge, Reasoning, and Problem-Solving Standards |
|
|
Level 4 |
These students exceed the standards and are moving toward high performance on the Regents examination. |
|
Level 3 |
These students meet the standards and, with continued steady growth, should pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 2 |
These students need extra help to meet the standards and pass the Regents examination. |
|
Level 1 |
These students have serious academic deficiencies. |
Performance of
Middle-Level Students with Severe Disabilities on the New York State Alternate
Assessment (NYSAA) in Mathematics, Science, and Technology
|
|
Number
Tested |
AA–Level 1 |
AA–Level 2 |
AA–Level 3 |
AA–Level 4 |
|
2001–02 |
2,071 |
141 |
727 |
1,181 |
22 |
Middle Level
Science
Middle-Level Science and Regents
Science Performance of Middle-Level Students
(All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
NY State
Public
|
|
Performance Statewide |
Counts of
Students Tested
|
Mean Score |
|||||
|
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Total |
|||
June 2002 |
Middle-Level Science |
10,180 |
34,773 |
82,014 |
51,400 |
178,367 |
73 |
Regents Science |
299 |
399 |
5,195 |
8,734 |
14,627 |
84 |
|
Middle-Level Science Levels — Knowledge, Reasoning, and Problem-Solving Standards* |
|
|
Level 4 |
These students exceed the standards on the middle-level science test and are moving toward high performance on the Regents examinations or score 85–100 on a Regents science examination. |
|
Level 3 |
These students meet the standards on the middle-level science test and, with continued steady growth, should pass the Regents examinations or score 65–84 on a Regents science examination. |
|
Level 2 |
These students need extra help to meet the standards for middle-level science and to pass the Regents examinations or score 55–64 on a Regents science examination. |
|
Level 1 |
These students have serious academic deficiencies as evidenced in the middle-level science test or score 0–54 on a Regents science examination. |
*Students may demonstrate proficiency in middle-level
science by scoring at level 3 or above on the middle-level science test or by
scoring 65 or above on a Regents examination in science.
High School English
Achievement
after Four Years of Instruction
The graph and table below present performance of the 1997 and
1998 cohort members on the Regents English examination four years after
entering grade 9. A score of 65 or above on this examination is considered
passing. Only the highest score of each student is counted, regardless of how
many times the student took the examination. In the graph, students passing
approved alternatives to this examination are counted as scoring in the 65 to
84 range. In the table, the numbers of students who met the graduation
requirement by passing an approved alternative or the Regents competency tests
(RCTs) in reading and writing are listed separately. (RCT results are not included
in the graph.) Students who score 55 to 64 on the Regents examination in
comprehensive English may be given credit towards a local high school diploma
if allowed by the district board of education.
|
Achievement
on the Regents Examination in Comprehensive English after Four Years (All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
NY State Public
|
|||||||
|
English
Graduation Requirement Achievement after Four Years of High School* |
|||||||
|
|
Student
Category |
Cohort Members |
Highest Score Between 55 and 64 |
Highest Score Between 65 and 84 |
Highest Score Between 85 and 100 |
Approved
Alternative Credit |
Passed RCT |
|
1997 Cohort |
General Education |
145,237 |
19,319 |
88,979 |
20,930 |
132 |
204 |
|
Students
w/ Disabilities |
12,060 |
3,358 |
4,387 |
152 |
5 |
1,506 |
|
|
All Students |
157,297 |
22,677 |
93,366 |
21,082 |
137 |
1,710 |
|
|
1998 Cohort |
General Education |
144,644 |
12,710 |
77,497 |
37,678 |
143 |
102 |
|
Students
w/ Disabilities |
13,202 |
2,359 |
4,670 |
445 |
3 |
1,253 |
|
|
All Students |
157,846 |
15,069 |
82,167 |
38,123 |
146 |
1,355 |
|
*Assessments used to determine counts in this table include
the Regents examination in comprehensive English, the component retest in
English, the Regents competency tests in reading and writing, and approved
alternatives.
High School Mathematics
Achievement
after Four Years of Instruction
The graph and table below present performance of the 1997 and 1998 cohort members, four years after entering grade 9, in meeting the graduation assessment requirement in mathematics. A score of 65 or above on a Regents examination in mathematics is considered passing. Only the highest score of each student is counted, regardless of how many times the student took the examination. In the graph, students passing approved alternatives to these examinations are counted as scoring in the 65 to 84 range. In the table, the numbers of students who met the graduation requirement by passing an approved alternative or the Regents competency test (RCT) in mathematics are listed separately. (RCT results are not included in the graph.) Students who score 55 to 64 on a Regents examination in mathematics may be given credit towards a local high school diploma if allowed by the district board of education.
|
Achievement
on the Regents Examination in Mathematics after Four Years (All Students:
General Education and Students with Disabilities)
NY State Public
|
|||||||
|
Mathematics
Graduation Requirement Achievement after Four Years of High School* |
|||||||
|
|
Student
Category |
Cohort Members |
Highest Score Between 55 and 64 |
Highest Score Between 65 and 84 |
Highest Score Between 85 and 100 |
Approved
Alternative Credit |
Passed RCT |
|
1997 Cohort |
General Education |
145,237 |
12,501 |
52,415 |
59,323 |
1,572 |
501 |
|
Students
w/ Disabilities |
12,060 |
1,295 |
3,433 |
1,349 |
54 |
3,423 |
|
|
All Students |
157,297 |
13,796 |
55,848 |
60,672 |
1,626 |
3,924 |
|
|
1998 Cohort |
General Education |
144,644 |
13,194 |
52,157 |
59,060 |
7 |
350 |
|
Students
w/ Disabilities |
13,202 |
1,246 |
3,441 |
1,172 |
0 |
2,955 |
|
|
All Students |
157,846 |
14,440 |
55,598 |
60,232 |
7 |
3,305 |
|
*Assessments used to
determine counts in this table include Regents mathematics examinations, the
component retest in mathematics, the Regents competency test in mathematics,
and approved alternatives.
Graduation Rates for the 1998
Cohort
Students were counted as graduates
if they earned a local diploma with or without a Regents endorsement no later
than June 2002. Additional students may
have earned diplomas in August 2002. For the purpose of calculating graduation
rate, students who transferred to GED programs were included in the count of
students in the cohort. These students were not counted as cohort members for
other purposes. Therefore, the count in the table below may be higher than the
count of cohort members shown on previous pages.
|
Graduation
Rates for the 1998 Cohort
NY State Public
|
Graduation Rates for the 1998 Cohort |
||
Student Category |
Graduation Rate Cohort |
Number of Graduates |
|
General-education
students |
148,209 |
115,192 |
|
Students with disabilities |
14,128 |
7,660 |
|
Total |
162,337 |
122,852 |
Analysis of Student Subgroup
Performance
Historically, on State assessments the
average performance of Black, Hispanic, and Native American students has been
lower than that of White and Asian students.
Similarly, students from low-income families have not performed as well
as those from higher income families. A high priority of the Board of Regents
is to eliminate these gaps in student performance. In addition, Title I of the
federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act includes explicit requirements
“to ensure that students served by Title I are given the same opportunity to
achieve to high standards and are held to the same high expectations as all
students in each State.”
This section of the report card
provides performance data by racial/ethnic group, disability status, gender,
English proficiency status, income level, and migrant status. The purpose of
the student subgroup analyses is to determine if students who perform below the
standards in any district tend to fall into particular groups, such as minority
students, limited English proficient students, or economically disadvantaged
students. If these analyses provide evidence that students in one of the groups
achieve at a lower level than other students in a particular district or
school, the district/school and community should examine the reasons for this
lower performance and make necessary changes in curriculum, instruction, and
student support services to remedy these performance gaps.
Elementary Level
English Language Arts
Student Subgroup |
2000–01 |
2001–02 |
||||||
Tested |
Percentages of Tested Students Scoring at Levels |
Tested |
Percentages of Tested Students Scoring at Levels |
|||||
2–4 |
3–4 |
4 |
2–4 |
3–4 |
4 |
|||
Results by Race/Ethnicity |
||||||||
|
American Indian/Alaskan Native |
892 |
82 |
42 |
8 |
911 |
87 |
45 |
9 |
|
Black |
45,399 |
81 |
39 |
6 |
44,252 |
84 |
42 |
10 |
|
Hispanic |
37,840 |
80 |
40 |
7 |
37,699 |
85 |
42 |
9 |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
11,199 |
94 |
69 |
24 |
11,592 |
96 |
74 |
31 |
|
White |
119,634 |
96 |
74 |
24 |
118,281 |
97 |
74 |
27 |
|
Total* |
215,037 |
90 |
60 |
17 |
212,820 |
92 |
61 |
21 |
|
Small Group Totals (s) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Results by Disability Status
|
||||||||
|
General-education
students |
186,895 |
93 |
65 |
19 |
185,427 |
95 |
66 |
23 |
|
Students with disabilities |
28,142 |
65 |
26 |
3 |
27,393 |
72 |
30 |
4 |
|
Total* |
215,037 |
90 |
60 |
17 |
212,820 |
92 |
61 |
21 |
Results by Gender
|
||||||||
|
Female |
105,497 |
91 |
63 |
20 |
103,952 |
93 |
64 |
24 |
|
Male |
109,540 |
88 |
57 |
14 |
108,868 |
91 |
59 |
17 |
|
Total* |
215,037 |
90 |
60 |
17 |
212,820 |
92 |
61 |
21 |
Results by English Proficiency Status
|
||||||||
|
English proficient |
208,903 |
91 |
61 |
17 |
207,208 |
93 |
63 |
21 |
|
Limited English proficient |
6,134 |
48 |
13 |
1 |
5,612 |
57 |
14 |
2 |
|
Total* |
215,037 |
90 |
60 |
17 |
212,820 |
92 |
61 |
21 |
Results by Income Level
|
||||||||
|
Economically disadvantaged |
101,113 |
83 |
42 |
7 |
100,756 |
86 |
44 |
10 |
|
Not disadvantaged |
113,923 |
96 |
76 |
26 |
111,970 |
97 |
77 |
30 |
|
Total* |
215,037 |
90 |
60 |
17 |
212,820 |
92 |
61 |
21 |
Results by Migrant Status
|
||||||||
|
Migrant family |
117 |
77 |
38 |
2 |
101 |
87 |
40 |
6 |
|
Not migrant family |
214,920 |
90 |
60 |
17 |
212,719 |
92 |
61 |
21 |
|
Total* |
215,037 |
90 |
60 |
17 |
212,820 |
92 |
61 |
21 |
*Individual small group
counts may not add up to total counts because student subgroup classifications
may not have been reported for some students.
Elementary Level
Mathematics
Student Subgroup |
2000–01 |
2001–02 |
||||||
Tested |
Percentages of Tested Students Scoring at Levels |
Tested |
Percentages of Tested Students Scoring at Levels |
|||||
2–4 |
3–4 |
4 |
2–4 |
3–4 |
4 |
|||
Results by Race/Ethnicity |
||||||||
|
American Indian/Alaskan Native |
903 |
85 |
57 |
15 |
916 |
88 |
55 |
12 |
|
Black |
45,387 |
82 |
46 |
10 |
44,286 |
85 |
45 |
8 |
|
Hispanic |
41,928 |
84 |
49 |
11 |
40,909 |
87 |
49 |
9 |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
11,316 |
97 |
83 |
42 |
11,792 |
97 |
83 |
40 |
|
White |
120,258 |
97 |
84 |
37 |
118,528 |
97 |
81 |
31 |
|
Total* |
219,854 |
91 |
69 |
26 |
216,521 |
93 |
67 |
23 |
|
Small Group Totals (s) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Results by Disability Status
|
||||||||
|
General-education
students |
191,087 |
95 |
74 |
29 |
188,861 |
95 |
72 |
25 |
|
Students with disabilities |
28,767 |
71 |
39 |
8 |
27,660 |
74 |
37 |
6 |
|
Total* |
219,854 |
91 |
69 |
26 |
216,521 |
93 |
67 |
23 |
Results by Gender
|
||||||||
|
Female |
107,774 |
92 |
69 |
26 |
105,727 |
93 |
67 |
21 |
|
Male |
112,080 |
91 |
69 |
27 |
110,794 |
92 |
68 |
24 |
|
Total* |
219,854 |
91 |
69 |
26 |
216,521 |
93 |
67 |
23 |
Results by English Proficiency Status
|
||||||||
|
English proficient |
209,196 |
93 |
71 |
28 |
207,689 |
94 |
69 |
23 |
|
Limited English proficient |
10,658 |
65 |
27 |
4 |
8,832 |
71 |
29 |
5 |
|
Total* |
219,854 |
91 |
69 |
26 |
216,521 |
93 |
67 |
23 |
Results by Income Level
|
||||||||
|
Economically disadvantaged |
105,078 |
86 |
53 |
13 |
103,376 |
87 |
51 |
10 |
|
Not disadvantaged |
114,775 |
97 |
84 |
39 |
113,051 |
|||
